In my previous post I discussed a backlog of foreclosure properties, coupled with a growing pool of homeowners needing to sell, potentially creating a surge in the number of homes for sale in Pickens County GA, and other parts of the country.
I have since read further "dire predictions" about the next wave of foreclosures and the potential for additional price drops in a majority of the markets surveyed. I have also read countervailing theories and reports of growing improvements in home sales and values.
So the big question is, what do we do? Believe the predictions? Buy into the hype? And if so, whose argument should we believe in choosing our course?
For buyers, there is the obvious concern of buying into a declining market. On the other hand, if we've already reached a "bottom"-- as some would hold -- the only direction for prices is up, so not buying now could be costly down the road. For sellers there is the similar challenge of knowing "when to hold" and "when to fold". Sell now before prices decline further, or wait for a turnaround and a better price?
To me, this is very similar to trying to "time" the stock market as a whole. It's like watching the Dow Jones or NASDAQ indices and trying to decide based on current performance whether the trend will be up or down for the future. And from there, if the decision is to participate in the market at all, trying to decide on a particular stock or company, based on a similar prediction as to whether those shares are going to perform better or worse in the future. This requires a certain level of guesswork (dare I say gambling?), to suggest at what point a floor or ceiling has been reached, and whether this is now a "safe" investment with all potential downside removed.
The are plenty of Wall Street analysts calling both sides of the coin. Only a few get it right. Even fewer with any consistency. The truth is, predicting the future has never been a very reliable means of decision making.
I think an analysis of successful investors will show that a majority of them generated their good returns by picking companies with solid fundamentals and holding for the long term. Their decision is based on factors such as a quality product or service, good management, appealing P/E Ratio, etc. Of course there are the stories that abound of millions made overnight via "lucky" investments in tech startups and so on, but these are anomalies, much like suggesting that winning the lottery is a wise investment "strategy". Absolutely, it would be great if you can do it . . .
Likewise, selling smart in the stock market isn't always the windfall of an insider tip, "premonition", or knowledge of the future. It is a sound decision based largely on changing investment needs, restructuring, or early warning signs of potential trouble on the horizon for that company or sector. An investment held for a long time that has seen comfortable gains can be easily divested, even in the face of an already declining stock price, leaving no need for second-guessing. If the pricing pressure is seen as temporary due to some particular event, such as a lawsuit, product recall, or other "bad" news, but the company's fundamentals remain strong, the option remains of riding the stock to the bottom and back up again, if it is a long term investment.
Since real estate is perhaps the largest investment most people will ever make in their lives, it seems that similar logic to other forms of investing should apply. Of course, the analogy isn't 100% identical, as there are a lot of factors, considerations, and data available in stock trading that there aren't in real estate, but the decision making should be similar.
In real estate, as with the stock market, even the so-called "experts" are often caught flat-footed by the direction of the real estate market as a whole. Just as deciding that the Dow hitting "10,000" is a good time to jump in, or when it drops to "8,000" is a time to bail, deciding to buy or sell a home based on national sales statistics reported in the Case-Schiller Index, by the National Association of Realtors, or the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), is like playing darts while blindfolded.
Declines or gains in home and land sales volume or price have a tendency to vary greatly by location, much as certain sectors in the stock market may perform against the general trend of the index on which they are listed. Precious metals may be a good investment versus energy stocks in an otherwise declining market. Likewise, buying or selling in the southeast may be a very different proposition from the midwest. Atlanta may be very different to Chattanooga. And Jasper may be completely opposite to Atlanta, based on local dynamics. Certain neighborhoods in Jasper may in turn perform better or worse than other neighborhoods in the area.
As described above, when investing in the stock market, one generally doesn't invest in the market as a whole, or even a sector, but a carefully chosen company or two. The same is true of buying a home. The broader market, the area, the city, the neighborhood, are all just a general backdrop which have to be taken into consideration, but, the actual investment is the home itself.
So, ultimately, in my opinion, rather than the question I hear so often "How's the real estate market? Is it a good time to buy / sell?", a better question might be, "Based on my particular unique set of circumstance in the current environment, is it a good time for me to buy or sell a home?"
If considering a purchase, the issue should always be,"Is buying this house as a long term investment, in this location, at this moment in time, a good decision for me?". If deciding whether or not to sell, similarly the issue is, "What are my alternatives, options and consequences, in choosing to sell or not sell at this precise moment?"
Questions which will be more fully explored in Part 3 of this post . . .